Surfshark vs NordVPN 2026: Cheap vs Premium Compared

This guide covers: Surfshark vs NordVPN 2026: Cheap vs Premium Compared.

Surfshark and NordVPN now share a parent company (Nord Security merged with Surfshark in 2022), but they operate as separate products with different pricing, features, and target users. The honest short answer: NordVPN is the more polished premium product, Surfshark is cheaper and gives you unlimited simultaneous connections. This comparison covers the details that actually change the decision.

At a glance

Pricing: Surfshark is cheaper, meaningfully

On a 2-year plan, Surfshark is roughly $53 total versus NordVPN at about $80. Monthly prices are nearly identical. The bigger differentiator is that Surfshark allows unlimited simultaneous connections on one account. For a family, a small team, or a household with a lot of devices, that single feature can be worth more than the price gap.

Speed: close, NordVPN slightly ahead

Both run WireGuard-based tunnels (NordLynx is Nord's WireGuard implementation). Independent tests in 2025-2026 show NordLynx typically a few percent faster on long-haul connections, with more consistent performance under load. Surfshark is not slow - it is simply slightly behind on raw numbers.

Verify with a speed test on a nearby server, then repeat from a distant one. Differences of a few percent fade behind ISP and Wi-Fi variance. Confirm the exit ASN is what you expect with our ASN lookup.

Privacy: both audited, both solid

Both pass independent audits. NordVPN commissions full no-logs audits from Deloitte. Surfshark ran an infrastructure audit in 2021 and has repeated app-level audits since. Both are RAM-only on most of their fleet, both publish transparency reports, and neither has had a confirmed user-data incident. Jurisdictionally, NordVPN in Panama is a common recommendation; Surfshark moved to the Netherlands in 2021, which is a member of the 9-Eyes alliance but has no mandatory data retention applicable to VPN services.

For a typical privacy user - avoiding ISP tracking, unblocking content, protecting public Wi-Fi - the posture of both providers is strong enough.

Apps and features

Where Surfshark wins

• Unlimited device connections. One account covers every device in the house.
• CleanWeb: DNS-level ad and tracker blocking at no extra cost.
• Alternative ID / anonymous email aliasing on the higher plans for email anonymity.
• NoBorders and Camouflage for restrictive networks.

Where NordVPN wins

• More advanced features: Double VPN, Onion over VPN, Meshnet (peer-to-peer networking between your own devices), dedicated IP option.
• Threat Protection: malware and tracker blocking that runs even when the VPN tunnel is off.
• Bigger network: 8,400+ servers across 167+ countries, which matters if you need specific city-level exits.
• Longer and deeper audit track record.

Streaming: both strong

Both unblock Netflix US, UK, Canada, Japan, Disney+, Prime Video, HBO Max, and BBC iPlayer consistently. NordVPN's larger server count means fewer "server not working on this library" moments, but it is a marginal difference rather than a decisive one.

Which one to pick

Pick Surfshark if you want:

• Unlimited simultaneous device connections.
• The cheapest premium VPN on a 2-year plan.
• Ad and tracker blocking bundled at no extra cost.
• A clean, simple app without feature clutter.

Pick NordVPN if you want:

• Advanced features: double VPN, Meshnet, dedicated IP, Onion over VPN.
• The broadest server network for city-level exit choice.
• The longest independent audit track record.
• Threat Protection even when the VPN is off.

What changes given the shared parent company

Since the Nord Security - Surfshark merger, the products share some backend infrastructure expertise but remain separate apps, separate audits, and separate privacy policies. For most users, treat them as distinct products. Privacy-sensitive users who prefer full corporate independence may prefer Mullvad or Proton VPN; see our Proton VPN vs Mullvad comparison.

How to verify whichever you pick

1. Install the client and connect to a server in a different country.
2. Confirm the IP and ASN change on our IP lookup and ASN lookup.
3. Run a full leak sweep with Is my VPN working? - DNS, IPv6, WebRTC.
4. Test the kill switch by killing the VPN process and confirming no traffic leaks until the tunnel reconnects.

How to frame this comparison correctly

Surfshark and NordVPN are often presented as if one is the "cheap one" and the other is the "serious one." That oversimplifies the real decision. Both are strong products. Both serve mainstream users well. The more useful distinction is this: Surfshark is optimized for value, simplicity, and unlimited-device households, while NordVPN aims to be a more premium all-rounder with deeper tooling and a broader network.

That means the better choice depends less on abstract quality and more on how you plan to live with the VPN. A household with many devices and a tight budget feels the Surfshark advantage immediately. A user who cares about advanced features, more city and country choice, and deeper specialty tooling feels the NordVPN advantage immediately.

Pricing and value beyond the headline number

Surfshark's long-term pricing is its clearest advantage. If you are comparing two-year commitments, Surfshark usually lands far below NordVPN while still giving you a high-quality premium product. That is not a small edge. Over a long enough subscription, the difference pays for other security tools or simply lowers the mental barrier to keeping the VPN active across the household.

NordVPN justifies the higher spend with a broader feature stack, a larger infrastructure footprint, and a slightly more mature premium positioning. The question is not whether NordVPN has a reason for the higher price. It does. The question is whether you will actually use the things that make it more expensive.

For many households the honest answer is no. If the goal is "keep a lot of devices protected without paying premium-premium pricing," Surfshark is often the more rational buy.

Unlimited devices versus a larger, deeper platform

Unlimited simultaneous connections are not just a nice marketing line. They change the economics of the product. Surfshark is unusually easy to recommend to families, shared households, or anyone who wants a single account across phones, laptops, tablets, TVs, and secondary devices without constantly thinking about limits.

NordVPN's device limit is high enough for most single users and many couples, but it still requires thought in a busier household. What NordVPN gives instead is a more expansive platform story: more servers, more specialty features, and a slightly more premium feel when you start pushing beyond basic browsing and streaming.

So this comparison often becomes a question of whether your household is license-constrained or feature-constrained. If device count is the real pain, Surfshark solves it more elegantly.

Speed and performance in real use

Both providers are fast. Neither one belongs in the "good enough, but noticeably slower" category. Where NordVPN usually edges ahead is on consistency under heavier load, long-distance routes, and peak-time pressure. That advantage is real, but it is often smaller than the pricing difference suggests.

Surfshark performs well enough that many users will never feel held back by it. If your daily use is web browsing, streaming, travel Wi-Fi, and general account security, Surfshark already clears the performance bar. NordVPN matters more when your expectations are slightly higher: cleaner redundancy, broader location choice, and more confidence when a particular server pool gets noisy or burned.

Privacy posture and what the corporate relationship really means

The shared parent company makes some users uneasy because they assume product differentiation becomes mostly cosmetic after a merger. That is not the right way to read it. Surfshark and NordVPN still operate as distinct products, with different pricing, features, policies, and user experience. Shared ownership may influence backend expertise and infrastructure maturity, but it does not erase the differences that matter to buyers.

On privacy, both providers are strong enough for mainstream use. Both publish transparency material, both rely on modern protocols, and both have completed serious audits. NordVPN has the longer, deeper audit and no-logs credibility story. Surfshark has improved steadily and is no longer easy to dismiss as the "budget compromise" option.

If you want the cleaner premium trust story, NordVPN still has the edge. If you mainly want a credible, well-audited service without paying top premium pricing, Surfshark is easier to defend than it used to be.

Streaming and entertainment use

Both brands are strong for mainstream streaming use, which is why this category usually fails to settle the comparison. The more important question is not whether each one can unblock major services at least sometimes. It is how quickly you recover when a particular exit gets burned and how much patience the product demands from you.

NordVPN tends to feel more resilient because it has a broader network and more redundancy. Surfshark is still very usable, especially at its price point. The honest conclusion is that both are good, but NordVPN is slightly more reliable over time while Surfshark is slightly better value when streaming is only one use case among many.

Feature depth: where NordVPN earns the premium label

NordVPN gives you more ways to use the VPN beyond ordinary consumer routing. Meshnet, dedicated IP options, double VPN, Onion over VPN, and Threat Protection together create a more ambitious product. Even if you do not use them on day one, they expand what the service can grow into.

Surfshark keeps the feature story more focused. CleanWeb, NoBorders, Camouflage, and the broader security bundles on higher plans cover the mainstream needs well. Surfshark's product philosophy is less about maximum specialty depth and more about getting a lot of practical value into a cheaper package.

Everyday usability

Surfshark is easier to love when you want a household-friendly VPN that does not feel overly serious. The apps are approachable, the account model is simple, and the unlimited-device promise removes a lot of friction before the service is even installed.

NordVPN feels more premium and somewhat more feature-dense. That is good when the user wants more control. It is slightly less ideal when the user just wants to roll out a VPN across many casual devices and never think about it again.

Families, shared households, and multi-device buyers

This is Surfshark's strongest lane. Unlimited connections can matter more than marginal differences in speed or audit narrative when the real task is to cover a family. Smart TVs, spare phones, tablets, travel laptops, kids' devices, and second desktops add up quickly. An account that never asks you to count is a genuine quality-of-life feature.

NordVPN still works for many homes, especially smaller ones, but it starts asking you to budget slots. If device sprawl is one of the reasons you are buying a VPN, Surfshark has the more elegant answer.

Power users, travel-heavy users, and specialty cases

The moment you move beyond "I want a good VPN on lots of devices," NordVPN starts to look stronger. Travel-heavy users, users who want finer location choice, and users who may later care about dedicated IP or Meshnet get more ceiling from NordVPN than from Surfshark.

That is the recurring pattern in this comparison. Surfshark wins value and household simplicity. NordVPN wins depth and premium flexibility.

When the shared parent company should influence your decision

Some buyers will reject both because they prefer fully independent providers on principle. That is a legitimate preference. If corporate independence is a major trust criterion for you, look at Proton VPN or Mullvad as well.

For everyone else, the shared parent should mostly matter as context, not as the deciding factor. The more important question is still which of the two products fits your usage better.

Use-case verdicts

Choose Surfshark for:

• Best value on long plans.
• Unlimited devices for households or families.
• Users who want a strong mainstream VPN without premium-premium pricing.
• People who prioritize practical simplicity.

Choose NordVPN for:

• Broader feature depth and a more premium overall platform.
• More server choice and slightly stronger consistency.
• Users who expect streaming to be a major use case.
• Buyers who may want dedicated IP, Meshnet, or specialty tooling.

Decision shortcuts

1. If device count is your main problem, start with Surfshark.
2. If feature depth is your main priority, start with NordVPN.
3. If your budget is tight, Surfshark usually wins.
4. If you want the safer premium all-rounder, NordVPN usually wins.
5. If you care most about corporate independence, compare both with Proton or Mullvad.

FAQ

Is Surfshark good enough compared with NordVPN?

Yes. It is not just "acceptable for the price." It is a genuinely strong VPN. NordVPN is better in some categories, but Surfshark is more than good enough for many users and households.

Is NordVPN worth the extra money?

It can be if you actually use the premium advantages: broader network, more specialty tools, slightly better resilience, and a stronger overall premium feel. If you mostly need household coverage and value, Surfshark is harder to beat.

Which one is better for families?

Surfshark usually wins because unlimited simultaneous connections solve a real household problem more elegantly than a finite device cap.

Which one is better for power users?

NordVPN usually wins because the extra feature ceiling and server depth give advanced users more room to work with.

Should I switch if I already use one of them?

Switch only if your needs changed. Move to Surfshark for better value and unlimited devices. Move to NordVPN for stronger premium depth and a broader feature stack.

Common mistakes in this comparison

• Treating Surfshark as "cheap, therefore weaker" when it is actually a genuinely strong premium option with a different target.
• Paying extra for NordVPN without expecting to use any of the things that make it more premium.
• Ignoring the household advantage of unlimited devices.
• Choosing only by review score instead of by household shape and use case.

Final practical verdict

Surfshark is the better buy for a very large slice of real users because it solves the everyday problem well at a lower long-term cost. If you want strong streaming, clean apps, modern privacy features, and one account for every device in the house, Surfshark is hard to beat on value.

NordVPN is still the better premium all-rounder. It gives you a larger network, more specialty tools, and slightly more confidence when the job moves beyond everyday consumer use into heavier streaming, travel, or feature-specific workflows.

So the honest short answer is simple. Buy Surfshark when value and unlimited devices dominate the decision. Buy NordVPN when you want the stronger premium ceiling and are willing to pay for it.

Buyer profiles: who feels the difference most?

The cost-conscious family

This is Surfshark's ideal audience. The family wants a credible VPN everywhere, does not want to count device slots, and does not want to pay a premium simply for the prestige of doing so. Surfshark meets that brief unusually well.

The premium all-rounder buyer

This user does not mind paying somewhat more if the product feels more complete and more future-proof. They may not need Meshnet or dedicated IP on day one, but they like knowing the service has more depth if their needs evolve. That is the user NordVPN fits best.

The non-technical household

If the main challenge is simple rollout across many devices, Surfshark's unlimited-connections model removes a surprising amount of friction. NordVPN can still work here, but it asks the household to care about limits in a way Surfshark does not.

The demanding travel or streaming user

This user benefits more from NordVPN's larger network and broader fallback options. When the obvious exit does not work, extra depth matters.

Security extras and what they mean in practice

Both providers now bundle more than bare tunneling. The difference is in emphasis. Surfshark focuses on practical consumer additions that improve day-to-day life without making the product feel intimidating. NordVPN pushes further into a richer security platform identity.

For many users, Surfshark's lighter set of extras is actually an advantage. They want cleaner onboarding, ad and tracker blocking, and a service that covers every device without looking like a tool meant for specialists. NordVPN's extras become most valuable when the user actively wants to experiment with features beyond the mainstream default.

Travel, hotel Wi-Fi, and everyday reliability

Both services are viable travel companions, but NordVPN usually gives the heavier traveler more room to recover from bad conditions. A larger network means more fallback paths when a specific server range is slow, blocked, or simply overloaded at the wrong moment.

Surfshark is still perfectly usable for routine travel privacy. It just feels more like the value-oriented choice than the one built to solve every premium edge case. If you only travel occasionally, that may be a perfectly good trade.

Router use, TVs, and shared environments

The more your VPN strategy depends on shared devices and household coverage, the more Surfshark's unlimited-device policy matters. It is one of the few benefits that gets more valuable as the household gets messier. Spare phones, guest tablets, Smart TVs, and secondary laptops all stop being a planning problem.

NordVPN can absolutely support shared environments too, but it does not remove the licensing question in the same elegant way. That is why household buyers often find Surfshark easier to justify, even when they accept that NordVPN is the stronger premium service in a vacuum.

How to decide if NordVPN's premium edge matters to you

Ask yourself whether you have already run into the limits of a mainstream VPN. Do you need more fallback routes? Do you want dedicated IP or Meshnet? Do you care about having a larger pool when streaming or traveling? If the answer is yes, NordVPN's extra spend often makes sense.

If the answer is no, then a lot of NordVPN's premium edge will remain theoretical. In that case Surfshark's lower cost and unlimited devices are not just "good enough." They may actually be the more rational choice.

Where each provider most often disappoints the wrong buyer

Surfshark disappoints users who expected the absolute strongest premium ceiling and deepest specialty tooling. NordVPN disappoints users who mostly wanted broad household coverage at the lowest long-term cost and then realize they are paying extra for strengths they rarely use.

That is why this comparison is less about which one is "better" and more about whether you are accidentally paying for the wrong virtues.

Short decision framework

1. Is device sprawl one of the reasons you are shopping? If yes, favor Surfshark.
2. Do you want deeper premium tools or a larger network? If yes, favor NordVPN.
3. Is budget sensitivity high? If yes, favor Surfshark.
4. Is streaming and location flexibility central? If yes, lean NordVPN.
5. Will the account be used by many casual users? If yes, lean Surfshark.

What the best choice looks like in the real world

A household with many devices, a moderate budget, and mostly mainstream needs should usually start with Surfshark. A user who wants the more polished premium benchmark and expects to lean on the VPN heavily should usually start with NordVPN. That is the shortest honest answer.

What the wrong choice looks like

The wrong Surfshark buyer is someone who actually wants the strongest premium feature ceiling and then feels shortchanged when the cheaper product is, unsurprisingly, less deep in a few areas. The wrong NordVPN buyer is someone who mainly needed simple, broad household coverage and then realizes they paid extra for premium strengths they rarely use.

That is why the comparison is best understood as value versus premium ceiling, not budget versus quality. Both are quality products. They are just optimized around different center points.

Per-platform setup differences

Both providers ship native apps for Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, Android TV, and Fire TV, and both expose WireGuard configuration files for router and manual setup. The day-to-day experience is similar, but the differences that matter mostly show up outside the main desktop app.

Windows and macOS

NordVPN's desktop client feels slightly more feature-dense. The map view, quick-connect, server categories (P2P, Double VPN, Onion, Obfuscated, Dedicated IP), and Threat Protection module all live in one place. The split tunneling implementation is stable on Windows and has improved on macOS after Apple's network-extension changes. Surfshark's client is cleaner and more beginner-friendly: a single server list, CleanWeb toggle, NoBorders and Camouflage options buried under advanced, and a lighter visual footprint. Neither client is obviously better; they are optimized for different users.

iOS and Android

Mobile is where the unlimited-device policy quietly pays off. A family with five phones, three tablets, two smart TVs, a gaming console, and a few laptops quickly blows past NordVPN's 10-device cap. On Surfshark, nobody has to sign anyone out. On NordVPN, you either buy a second plan, move to router coverage, or ration logins. The apps themselves are comparable in features and stability; the friction is in the account model.

Router and firmware coverage

NordVPN ships detailed guides for AsusWRT, Merlin, DD-WRT, OpenWRT, pfSense, and Firewalla, along with WireGuard config export for NordLynx. Surfshark supports the same router families and also exports WireGuard configs. Router coverage effectively sidesteps the device-limit question on NordVPN: one router counts as one device and protects every client behind it. That is the workaround power users lean on when they prefer NordVPN's feature depth but still want whole-home coverage.

Linux

NordVPN has the more mature Linux story. The CLI client supports NordLynx, Meshnet, and Threat Protection Lite (DNS filtering), and the community ships packaged builds for most major distributions. Surfshark provides a CLI as well, but its feature set is narrower and release cadence is slower. Linux-first users will generally feel less friction with NordVPN.

Smart TVs and streaming sticks

Both have Android TV and Fire TV apps. For Apple TV, NordVPN and Surfshark both ship native tvOS clients after Apple opened VPN APIs in late 2023. On older TVs without native app support, the router path is the same for both. If you bought the VPN primarily to unblock a specific library on a specific TV, test before committing. Stream unblocking changes per server and per week on both services.

Full verification walkthrough for either provider

Once you pick a provider and install it, actually confirming the tunnel is doing what you expect is a 10-minute exercise. Do it once when you install, then again after any OS update, app update, or network change.

1. Baseline without the VPN. Visit the IP lookup and record your ISP IP, city, country, and ASN. Run a DNS leak test and save the resolver list. This is your baseline for comparison.
2. Connect and recheck. Enable the VPN and connect to a nearby server. Reload the IP lookup. The IP, ASN, and geolocation should all change. If the ASN still shows your ISP, the tunnel is not carrying traffic.
3. DNS leak sweep.Rerun the DNS test. On Surfshark you should see Surfshark resolvers; on NordVPN you should see Nord resolvers. If your ISP's resolver still appears, your OS is bypassing the VPN's DNS and you need to enable the provider's custom DNS or disable Smart DNS / private DNS on your device.
4. IPv6 check. Run the IPv6 leak test. Both providers default to blocking or tunneling IPv6, but some router and ISP combinations push IPv6 around the tunnel anyway. If IPv6 is leaking, disable IPv6 on the interface or enable the provider's IPv6 leak protection.
5. WebRTC check. Run the WebRTC leak test in every browser you use. WebRTC leaks are a browser concern, not a VPN bug, but they still expose your real IP to sites that query ICE candidates. If you see your real IP, disable WebRTC in browser flags or install a blocker.
6. Kill switch stress test. With the VPN connected, force-kill the VPN process (Task Manager on Windows, Activity Monitor on macOS). Your connection should drop entirely until the tunnel reconnects. If traffic keeps flowing, the kill switch is disabled or broken.
7. Reconnection behavior. Put your laptop to sleep and wake it. Disconnect your Wi-Fi and reconnect. The tunnel should come back automatically without exposing plaintext traffic during the handoff. Both providers handle this well on recent client versions.

Troubleshooting: what goes wrong and how to fix it

Scenario-specific picks

Most VPN comparisons stay at the brand level. The decision usually depends on what you are actually trying to accomplish.

Torrenting and P2P

Both support P2P, both have strong kill switches, and both publish no-logs audits that make torrent logging a non-issue for mainstream use. NordVPN exposes dedicated P2P-optimized servers in the client; Surfshark allows P2P on most servers without a separate category. Performance is close; Surfshark wins on value because an unlimited-connection plan can also cover seedbox-adjacent devices in the same household without extra cost.

Gaming and low-latency work

NordLynx is slightly faster on paper and slightly more consistent under load, which matters for competitive gaming. NordVPN also has a wider server selection, so the closest server is more often genuinely close. Surfshark is usable for casual gaming but less ideal if you are chasing the lowest possible ping across a long route.

Streaming and region unblocking

Both unblock major libraries (Netflix US/UK/JP, Disney+, BBC iPlayer, Prime Video, HBO Max). NordVPN's bigger network means fewer dead exits per week and more room to rotate when one gets flagged. Surfshark is strong here but marginally less resilient during peak weekends.

Journalism, research, or sensitive communication

Neither is the right tool for high-risk threat models. For mainstream journalism, NordVPN's Double VPN and Onion over VPN options add obfuscation layers that Surfshark does not match. For genuinely adversarial work, Tor Browser or Tails is still the correct tool; the VPN is supplementary at best.

Traveling to restrictive networks

NordVPN's obfuscated servers and Surfshark's Camouflage mode serve the same purpose: disguise VPN traffic as ordinary HTTPS so firewalls that block protocol fingerprints cannot drop the tunnel. Effectiveness varies week to week on both. Bring a second provider or a Shadowsocks fallback if access is mission-critical.

Business use or remote work

Both are consumer products and neither markets itself as an enterprise solution. NordVPN sells NordLayer for business use; Surfshark does not have a business product of equivalent maturity. If this is actually a work-from-home VPN for a small team, NordLayer is the honest answer, not either consumer brand.

Cost of ownership beyond month one

Headline prices are loss-leader pricing on both providers. Both aggressively discount 2-year plans and then renew at a higher rate. Surfshark's renewal is usually cheaper than Nord's, but both roughly double at renewal compared to the introductory rate. Plan for that. If you know you will stay on the service for 3+ years, the actual cost is the renewal rate, not the first-term rate.

Both offer 30-day money-back guarantees. Both honor them if you cancel inside the window and contact support. Both will try to sell you a downgrade before processing the refund. This is not unique to either brand.

Expanded FAQ

Does the shared parent mean my data is co-mingled?

No. Surfshark and NordVPN have separate privacy policies, separate infrastructure, and separate app codebases. The merger was at the corporate level; the products did not merge.

Which one supports more obscure countries?

NordVPN lists 167+ countries versus Surfshark's 100. The overlap is large. If you need a specific country that is not a major market (e.g., smaller African or Pacific nations), check the live server lists before buying because both providers use virtual locations in some of these regions and the actual routing country may differ.

Can I use either without an account?

No. Both require an email address and payment method. Mullvad is the provider that sells anonymous account numbers with no email requirement; if that level of anonymity matters, neither of these fits.

Do either support port forwarding?

Neither supports port forwarding as of the current product state. This matters for some torrent workflows and self-hosting use cases. If port forwarding is important, look at AirVPN or ProtonVPN instead.

Which one handles changing networks better?

Both handle Wi-Fi-to-cellular handoffs well on mobile. Desktop reconnection is robust on both. The difference is in edge cases: NordVPN tends to reconnect slightly faster after resume-from-sleep on Windows; Surfshark is slightly more graceful on iOS backgrounding. Both differences are small.

Should I run both?

No, not at once. A chained VPN (one on the device, another on a router) adds latency and rarely improves security. If you want layered obfuscation, use NordVPN's Double VPN or Tor over VPN instead.

Will either protect against malware?

Partially. NordVPN's Threat Protection and Surfshark's CleanWeb both block known malicious domains at the DNS layer. Neither replaces a proper endpoint antivirus. Treat them as hardening, not protection.

Where this comparison becomes a coin flip

For a single user with 3-5 devices, mainstream streaming needs, and no interest in power-user features, both providers deliver the same practical outcome most days. The choice then comes down to taste: do you prefer Nord's denser, more feature-forward UI, or Surfshark's lighter, friendlier one? Either answer is defensible. If you cannot decide, start with whichever has the better active promotion; both ship 30-day refunds and switching later is cheap.

Related guides and reviews

• Surfshark review
• NordVPN review
• NordVPN vs ExpressVPN
• Best VPN comparison 2026
• Is my VPN working?

By Theodore Uzun

Founder and Senior Software Engineer, IP Trackers

Published April 18, 2026Editorially reviewed